Skip to content
All products

Training data

Supervised fine-tuning data.

High-quality tasks and expert-written responses for reasoning, instruction following, computer use, and professional knowledge.

Discuss your use case

Demonstrations shaped by your model’s use case.

Supervised fine-tuning examples pair a task and its context with an expert response. The response should solve the problem, follow the required format, and account for the constraints in the source material.

We scope the behaviors and situations your model needs to handle, then have specialists write and review examples against those requirements. Evaluation material stays separate from training data.

Define the behavior before collecting examples

Specify the inputs, required output, and what the model should do when information is missing. Vary the task conditions and difficulty, rather than collecting superficial rewrites.

  • Cover representative instructions and constraints.
  • Preserve source context and expected output formats.
  • Include difficult cases and appropriate uncertainty.

Review for correctness and task fit

Check correctness, instruction following, and support for claims. Record recurring errors so the next collection cycle addresses specific gaps.

  • Assess correctness and instruction following together.
  • Check consistency across reviewers and task variants.
  • Use evaluation findings to guide coverage decisions.

What a program can include

Scope can include:

  • Expert-authored instruction and response examples
  • Supporting context and task specifications
  • Review guidance and quality annotations
  • An agreed format for your training pipeline

Illustrative task / Not a production record

Make the objective concrete.

Objective
Write a grounded summary of a project document.
Context
The source document, a request to identify risks, and a required output structure.
Review
Verify that the summary captures the relevant facts, cites the supplied context, and follows the requested format.

Common questions

How does SFT data differ from preference data?

SFT demonstrations show a desired completion. Preference data compares alternative completions and records which is better under defined criteria. The two can support different stages of model development.

Can the examples reflect a professional domain?

Professional knowledge is part of the RDL offering. Scope the domain, reviewer expertise, source material, and acceptance criteria with the team before deciding what examples to collect.

Further reading

Built around your model

What does your model need to do?

Share representative tasks and examples of a good result. We’ll scope the data and evaluation with you.

Discuss your use case